<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Few Notes on Braves&#8217; Defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://section435.com/2009/07/22/a-few-notes-on-braves-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://section435.com/2009/07/22/a-few-notes-on-braves-defense/</link>
	<description>An Atlanta Braves blog. From the upper deck at Turner Field.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:34:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shaun</title>
		<link>http://section435.com/2009/07/22/a-few-notes-on-braves-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-2384</link>
		<dc:creator>shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://section435.com/?p=165#comment-2384</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t disagree with you; I&#039;m baffled as to where you get &quot;you assume its[sic] the equivalent of a DNA test.&quot;

And while I do agree that it&#039;s a flawed measure, name me one statistic that isn&#039;t flawed. That&#039;s the nature of statistics. I&#039;m actually heavily critical of those who are statistical completists (that&#039;s a post for another time). But that doesn&#039;t mean that we can&#039;t take what we learn from one flawed statistic and add it to the overall body of knowledge that we have to increase our understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t disagree with you; I&#8217;m baffled as to where you get &#8220;you assume its[sic] the equivalent of a DNA test.&#8221;</p>
<p>And while I do agree that it&#8217;s a flawed measure, name me one statistic that isn&#8217;t flawed. That&#8217;s the nature of statistics. I&#8217;m actually heavily critical of those who are statistical completists (that&#8217;s a post for another time). But that doesn&#8217;t mean that we can&#8217;t take what we learn from one flawed statistic and add it to the overall body of knowledge that we have to increase our understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hobo hal</title>
		<link>http://section435.com/2009/07/22/a-few-notes-on-braves-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-2383</link>
		<dc:creator>hobo hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://section435.com/?p=165#comment-2383</guid>
		<description>UZR is a crude, flawed measure. Among its many flaws, positioning outside of their static zones distorts the results. Having a certain UZR ratings doesn&#039;t mean much.Yet you assume its the equivalent of a DNA test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UZR is a crude, flawed measure. Among its many flaws, positioning outside of their static zones distorts the results. Having a certain UZR ratings doesn&#8217;t mean much.Yet you assume its the equivalent of a DNA test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
