<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 or Beyond?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://section435.com/2008/08/07/2009-or-beyond/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://section435.com/2008/08/07/2009-or-beyond/</link>
	<description>An Atlanta Braves blog. From the upper deck at Turner Field.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:34:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://section435.com/2008/08/07/2009-or-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://section435.com/?p=116#comment-316</guid>
		<description>I say let the rebuilding begin/continue. Our team is good enough as is to keep things quasi-interesting, for a bit at least, and no one piece will make them that much better. 

I think our starting pitching will hold up fine, if, of course, Hudson comes back healthy. Re-signing Glavine (if he doesn&#039;t retire) or Hampton wouldn&#039;t be a terrible idea, if it were for the right price.  

As for Francoeur, I&#039;d be surprised if Wren let him go but who knows. Get rid of Kotsay and let the young&#039;uns tough it out and develop next year - not much to lose if they don&#039;t measure up to a veteran&#039;s production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say let the rebuilding begin/continue. Our team is good enough as is to keep things quasi-interesting, for a bit at least, and no one piece will make them that much better. </p>
<p>I think our starting pitching will hold up fine, if, of course, Hudson comes back healthy. Re-signing Glavine (if he doesn&#8217;t retire) or Hampton wouldn&#8217;t be a terrible idea, if it were for the right price.  </p>
<p>As for Francoeur, I&#8217;d be surprised if Wren let him go but who knows. Get rid of Kotsay and let the young&#8217;uns tough it out and develop next year &#8211; not much to lose if they don&#8217;t measure up to a veteran&#8217;s production.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Section 435 &#8211; Hampton in 2009?</title>
		<link>http://section435.com/2008/08/07/2009-or-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Section 435 &#8211; Hampton in 2009?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://section435.com/?p=116#comment-315</guid>
		<description>[...] I talked about last time, more than anything, losing Hudson for most of next year really changes the outlook for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I talked about last time, more than anything, losing Hudson for most of next year really changes the outlook for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~JB</title>
		<link>http://section435.com/2008/08/07/2009-or-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>~JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://section435.com/?p=116#comment-314</guid>
		<description>You know, when you re evaluate the Tex trade, we basically ended up with Kotchman and &quot;duder&quot; for Neftali Feliz, Andrus, Satly, and.... (I&#039;m drawing a blank here...) 

So when/how do we say if it&#039;s worth it? I&#039;ll tell you one thing. After hearing about Feliz the 20 year old fireballer, I&#039;d love to have him back. But such is life. 

I think the rebuilding will really start this offseason. We lose Glavine, Hampton, and (maybe) Smoltz goes in the &#039;pen but we&#039;ve got some money to spend to go out and get three new starters (and I think we need all three spots filled by someone other than JoJo, James, Morton). I don&#039;t think Kotsay will stay but I&#039;m not sure there&#039;s an Anderson or Schaefer that&#039;s really ready for the full time job. Maybe we get a power hitting LF&#039;er and stick Blanco there. I&#039;d say he&#039;s had a good enough season to stick around. 

In short, this winter may really determine what kind of GM we have in Frank Wren. 

~JB</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, when you re evaluate the Tex trade, we basically ended up with Kotchman and &#8220;duder&#8221; for Neftali Feliz, Andrus, Satly, and&#8230;. (I&#8217;m drawing a blank here&#8230;) </p>
<p>So when/how do we say if it&#8217;s worth it? I&#8217;ll tell you one thing. After hearing about Feliz the 20 year old fireballer, I&#8217;d love to have him back. But such is life. </p>
<p>I think the rebuilding will really start this offseason. We lose Glavine, Hampton, and (maybe) Smoltz goes in the &#8216;pen but we&#8217;ve got some money to spend to go out and get three new starters (and I think we need all three spots filled by someone other than JoJo, James, Morton). I don&#8217;t think Kotsay will stay but I&#8217;m not sure there&#8217;s an Anderson or Schaefer that&#8217;s really ready for the full time job. Maybe we get a power hitting LF&#8217;er and stick Blanco there. I&#8217;d say he&#8217;s had a good enough season to stick around. </p>
<p>In short, this winter may really determine what kind of GM we have in Frank Wren. </p>
<p>~JB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maura</title>
		<link>http://section435.com/2008/08/07/2009-or-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Maura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://section435.com/?p=116#comment-313</guid>
		<description>Does this mean they&#039;d be more likely to sign Hampton again? Ha! But stranger things have happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean they&#8217;d be more likely to sign Hampton again? Ha! But stranger things have happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
